Site icon Heroic Technical Writing: Advice and Insights on the Business of Technical Communication

The Lost Art of the RSVP

Going to vent here today. I’m convinced that the RSVP is becoming a lost art–to the professional and personal detriment of us all.

First, a little French to start your day: RSVP is the acronym for the French term, Répondez s’il vous plaît, literally “Reply if you please” or “Reply please.”

Normally Americans reserve RSVPs for responding to party or event invitations. This is done especially in the case of weddings, where the bride/groom want to know how many people they need to feed. And it’s also just common courtesy, which brings me to the point of this entry.

A lot of “common courtesies” seem to have been kicked to the curb. My primary pet peeve along this line is a refusal to respond to emails, business or otherwise. If I’m contacting someone, I usually expect that they will respond…especially if I’m asking a question. I’m not certain if not responding to email is the result of the person not being available or merely a passive-aggressive tactic to avoid a conversation, but to me it’s a problem. With all the mobile devices we have to access our various channels–reaching someone is rarely an issue anymore. Getting a response is a whole different kettle of fish.

Perhaps I’m more sensitive about such matters because I’ve run a lot of events and many times inquiries related to events are time-sensitive. Yes, I can and do put TIME SENSITIVE in the subject line, but I shouldn’t have to do that.

What’s a reasonable amount of time to respond to an email? Depending on the time of day, I would expect at least an acknowledgement of the message within 24 hours. That’s not expecting too much, is it?

Here are the sorts of things that start galloping through my mind as I wait to see if someone is going to respond to my email:

For whatever reason, we’ve decided as a society that our multiple channels of electronic communications don’t require any sort of etiquette. I believe this is a mistake. As couples who have broken up over a misunderstood text can attest, we should put the same level of thought into our text communications, however immediate. That doesn’t mean writing whole volumes in the style of Jane Austen or Shakespeare. It does mean treating the person who sends you a message the same way you would if you were seeing them face to face. This includes:

There are productivity issues involved here, not just good manners. Everyone’s time is valuable, everyone is busy. I get that. Time is lost sending repeated messages, rescheduling meetings, or restructuring whole documents or events because someone didn’t reply to a message in the first place. I’ve seen it happen, and it’s not pretty.

If we’re going to make electronic tools our primary methods of communication, we should put in the same amount of effort to maintain relationships with people on the other end of those messages. If you wouldn’t be rude to someone in person, you probably shouldn’t do so just because you have a tool that makes that behavior easy. If you are willing to be rude to someone’s face, I can’t help you.

And here’s a thought: if you’re not getting an answer via text, that Android or iPhone you carry around also has this wacky calling feature that allows you to speak to another person with your human voice. And don’t forget to say “thank you” when you’re done with the call.

End of rant.

Exit mobile version